|
|
Zero Waste
Around the World
by Sam Cole
|
|
Websites with more information on Zero Waste
|
|
Europe -
Recycle Your Mercedes
On the heels of a European Union law requiring that all cars made
in Europe must be taken back free of charge by their makers (with
85% being reused or recycled), Mercedes is leading the pack. The
company has created a process where their cars can be dismantled
for recycling in just four hours. By reusing the recovered
materials, Mercedes is saving manufacturing costs and reducing
their burden on the earth’s natural resources.
Sweden - More of a Good Thing
First they required manufacturers to take back products for reuse
and recycling, now Sweden is getting tough on landfills. The
environmental agency there is recommending a $40 per ton tax on
dumping in a landfill. The current $25 tax has been so successful
at cutting landfill waste that a higher tax is expected to cut
waste even more. Colorado’s fee, by contrast, is less than $1 per
ton and is earmarked for cleaning up Superfund sites such as leaky
landfills. Compared to the rest of the country, Colorado is one of
the states that is committing the least amount of money for waste
reduction measures. In Alameda County, California, by comparison,
the $6 charge for each ton of waste generated goes towards
proactive waste reduction measures like recycling.
California - First It Was Hula Hoops, Now
it’s Zero Waste
Some say California is where it all starts. Remember hula hoops?
Well, now it’s Zero Waste. Last November the state’s Waste
Management Board adopted Zero Waste as one of its seven goals. For
a state with 34 million people, that’s quite a goal! Now
California will work with manufacturers to promote producer
responsibility – an idea that gets companies involved in “take
back” programs for the reuse and recycling of their products.
California law prohibits residents from throwing away computer
monitors and televisions due to their toxicity. This leaves cities
scrambling to find funds to create recycling programs. Now, the
electronics industry, government and the public will all be
involved in finding solutions to the growing problem of electronic
waste and food waste. The plan calls for “returning solid waste
materials back into nature or the marketplace in a manner that
protects human health and the environment.”
Berkeley - A Styrofoam®-Free City
The City of Berkeley isn’t fooled by manufacturers’
attempts to quell our fears about Styrofoam®. Although many
Styrofoam® containers are labeled “CFC free,” they still contain
chlorofluorocarbons. Because Styrofoam® production is still a
hazard to the earth’s ozone layer and contributes to global
warming, Berkeley is continuing to ban it in restaurants, fast
food joints and City-sponsored events. But these users can’t
replace the Styrofoam® with just anything – 50% of the new eating
ware has to be either recyclable or biodegradable.
South Africa - Zero Waste
Citing Zero Waste as a necessary step in sustainable development,
South Africa plans to get to Zero Waste by 2022. The announcement
was made in September 2001 at the First National Waste Management
Summit. The declaration said that product producers are
responsible for the physical and financial problems posed by their
waste, and that companies would be encouraged to manufacture more
environmentally-friendly products.
Norway - Landfill Ban
It didn’t seem possible just a few years ago, but now some
countries, such as Norway, are talking about banning landfills.
Landfills are increasingly seen as an archaic way to manage
discards because they destroy reusable resources. Bellona, an
environmental group in Norway calling for the ban, also cites
worries about global warming caused by methane gas produced by
landfills, which escapes into the atmosphere despite the use of
gas extraction systems (see related article on page 1). The
Norwegian government is also concerned about methane, and has
proposed banning food waste from landfills, (food waste produces
methane when it decomposes). As a greenhouse gas, methane is very
potent and can have 21 times the warming impact of carbon dioxide.
|
|